Skip to main content
Methodology published · Market data, model notes, and corrections process are public · Data policy · Corrections policy
GOOG logo

NASDAQ · COMMUNICATION SERVICES · TECHi Signal

Alphabet Inc Class C (GOOG) Stock Signal

TECHi Signal compresses current quote, fundamental, technical, analyst, and strategic inputs into one explainable research stance for GOOG.

Start here

GOOG: Balanced watch

Balanced watch. Track record validation (86/100) is the strongest signal; leadership depth (50/100) is the main constraint. Model confidence is 47/100 from 72 of 76 available inputs and a 66% freshness factor; 4 inputs are missing, so treat this as a directional research screen rather than a forecast. Analyst disagreement penalty is applied through the confidence model; the Analyst View card owns the published spread. Long-term secular context is tracked separately: 10 Years +904.5% total (100/100 progress score); yesterday +0.4%. Rolling price-history validation is 12.8% across 1072 matured horizon scores; full field-by-field accuracy still needs stored daily snapshots. It ranks #5/121 across fresh TECHi snapshots and #2/7 in Communication Services. Use the top read for speed, then inspect the Formula lab when you need the full evidence trail.

Signal

59/100

Low confidence

Inputs

72/76

87/100 factual coverage

Universe

#5/121

97/100 snapshot percentile

Nearest

Hold

1 Day +0.5%

Formula signalLow confidence72/76 inputsLast updated Jun 12, 7:59 PM EDT

Balanced watch

Dashboard view for the current Signal score, confidence, input coverage, and active horizon. The full narrative read lives in Start Here; the evidence trail is consolidated below.

Technical tape

54/100

12% wt

16/16 inputs

Forecast layer

64/100

10% wt

5/5 inputs

Valuation

54/100

10% wt

8/8 inputs

Risk brake

81/100

7% wt

8/8 inputs

59

Signal score

Active horizon

1 day to 10 years + strategic setup

87/100 factual coverage, 63% live source health.

Neon snapshot universe

GOOG against fresh TECHi coverage.

Peer ranks are recalculated from fresh quote snapshots using a bounded scalar score, so the context moves when the underlying data moves without slowing the page.

Universe rank

#5/121

97/100 percentile among scored fresh snapshots.

Sector rank

#2/7

Communication Services coverage cohort.

Fresh symbols

121

120 Neon rows read in the 7-day window.

Freshest pull

Jun 15, 2026

GOOG model as of Jun 12, 2026.

Horizon read

The stance changes by timeframe.

These are Formula stances by timeframe, not execution instructions. The full validation grid is below.

1 Day

37/100 conf

Hold

+0.5%

Risk brake 81/100 / Technical tape 54/100

7 Days

37/100 conf

Hold

+1.0%

Risk brake 81/100 / Technical tape 54/100

15 Days

37/100 conf

Hold

+2.1%

Track record validation 86/100 / Quality trend 74/100

30 Days

42/100 conf

Hold

+3.5%

Risk brake 81/100 / Quality trend 74/100

3 Months

42/100 conf

Hold

+5.9%

Quality trend 74/100 / Analyst/revision signal 64/100

6 Months

42/100 conf

Hold

+9.1%

Quality trend 74/100 / Analyst/revision signal 64/100

1 Year

44/100 conf

Hold

+13.8%

Quality trend 74/100 / Analyst/revision signal 64/100

3 Years

47/100 conf

Hold

+29.3%

Quality trend 74/100 / Future value 65/100

5 Years

47/100 conf

Buy

+46.9%

Quality trend 74/100 / Future value 65/100

10 Years

47/100 conf

Buy

+67.7%

Quality trend 74/100 / Future value 65/100

What moves it

Strongest inputs

Track record validation

86/100

8/8 inputs · 12% dashboard weight

Risk brake

81/100

8/8 inputs · 7% dashboard weight

Quality trend

74/100

9/9 inputs · 14% dashboard weight

Pressure points

Leadership depth

50/100

0/1 inputs · 4% dashboard weight

Social/developer traction

50/100

0/1 inputs · 2% dashboard weight

Technical tape

54/100

16/16 inputs · 12% dashboard weight

Habit loop

Watch the next price trigger, not just the score.

GOOG's nearest horizon is hold at +0.5%; use a dashboard price alert to catch the next break before the next Signal refresh.

Set price alert

Formula lab

Factor evidence, scenarios, horizons, and validation.

CompositeHorizonsValidation

Evidence lab

Balanced watch

Dashboard score

59

/100

1 day to 10 years + strategic setup

Low confidence

72 of 76 fields are powering the model.

History progress

Past returns in Signal

Scored windows

10 Years

100/100

+904.5%

+25.9% CAGR

$35.65 to $358.16

2016-06-10 to 2026-06-12

10-year progress tracks decade-scale compounding structure when enough closes exist.

5 Years

100/100

+187.5%

+23.5% CAGR

$124.59 to $358.16

2021-06-11 to 2026-06-12

5-year progress prioritizes compounding behavior to make strategic drift visible.

1 Year

100/100

+103.0%

+103.1% CAGR

$176.46 to $358.16

2025-06-12 to 2026-06-12

1-year progress blends current return with annualized context for cleaner long-cycle comparison.

Last month

26/100

-10.2%

CAGR unavailable

$398.80 to $358.16

2026-05-13 to 2026-06-12

1-month progress reflects recent tape with less sensitivity than daily windows.

Last week

43/100

-2.0%

CAGR unavailable

$365.54 to $358.16

2026-06-05 to 2026-06-12

1-week progress tracks short-cycle tape and can rotate meaningfully with each close cluster.

Yesterday

53/100

+0.4%

CAGR unavailable

$356.56 to $358.16

2026-06-11 to 2026-06-12

1-day progress tracks latest close-to-close momentum from tape.

1 empty progress windows are hidden until enough closes exist.

A-Z factor map

Available scoring inputs

25/26 factors

1 unscored inputs are hidden until the quote stack has verified fields for them.

Balance sheet

C

Cash runway

Balance sheet · 65/100

Current 1.92x; cash/debt 0.52x

Method

Checks liquidity, leverage, and balance-sheet room.

Data coverage

Z

Zero-missing risk

Data coverage · 75/100

7 missing fields

Method

Shows how much the model is relying on available fields versus placeholders.

External view

A

Analyst conviction

External view · 64/100

Consensus 4.11; upside +13.9%; disagreement +78%

Method

Uses consensus, target spread, target disagreement, revisions, and latest EPS surprise.

I

Implied upside

External view · 69/100

Target move +13.9%; disagreement +78%

Method

Measures analyst target room versus the latest quote and flags wide high-low target dispersion.

Forecast

U

Upside scenarios

Forecast · 68/100

Future 65/100; analyst 64/100

Method

Combines TECHi future-value signal with outside target support.

Fundamental proof

E

Earnings accuracy

Fundamental proof · 70/100

Positive EPS surprise rate 70/100

Method

Grades whether reported earnings have beaten estimates when history is available.

Growth

G

Growth pulse

Growth · 78/100

Revenue +21.8%; EPS +82%

Method

Compares latest YoY sales and earnings momentum.

Y

Year-over-year proof

Growth · 78/100

1M windows 72/100; 3M windows 83/100

Method

Looks for repeated conversion from past setups into later closes.

Momentum

J

Jump signal

Momentum · 45/100

5D return -2%

Method

Captures the newest short-term price impulse.

W

52-week position

Momentum · 89/100

Range position +81.3%

Method

Scores trend strength while trimming crowded highs.

Quality

F

Free cash flow

Quality · 21/100

FCF margin +2.4%; yield +0.2%

Method

Connects profit quality to cash generation and market value.

K

Key margins

Quality · 95/100

Gross +60.4%; operating +36.1%

Method

Rewards margin breadth before assigning quality confidence.

O

Operating leverage

Quality · 100/100

Operating margin +36.1%

Method

Shows whether revenue is converting into operating profit.

Q

Quality trend

Quality · 74/100

Quality composite 74/100

Method

Combines margins, returns, growth, and cash conversion.

Risk

B

Beta risk

Risk · 84/100

Beta 1.237

Method

Lower and steadier beta earns a stronger risk-adjusted score.

Sentiment

N

News tone

Sentiment · 57/100

8 headlines; neutral

Method

Headline breadth and sentiment are capped so news does not overpower data.

Strategic

L

Leadership depth

Strategic · 50/100

0 named executives

Method

Adds C-suite coverage for execution visibility.

S

Social/developer

Strategic · 50/100

Social composite 50/100

Method

Uses verified public channels and developer gravity when available.

Technical risk

D

Drawdown control

Technical risk · 53/100

90D max drawdown -18%

Method

Scores whether recent losses stayed controlled versus the latest peak.

Technicals

M

MACD pressure

Technicals · 24/100

MACD hist -3.69; slope 0.51

Method

Reads MACD line pressure against its signal line plus histogram direction.

R

RSI balance

Technicals · 59/100

RSI 14 43.5; Stoch %K 31.5

Method

Rewards constructive oscillator momentum without extreme overbought stretch.

T

Technical tape

Technicals · 54/100

20D -9.8%; ATR 3%; %B 0.21

Method

Blends returns, SMA/EMA crosses (above), RSI, MACD, Stochastic, Bollinger Bands, ATR, volume, volatility, and drawdown.

V

Volume confirmation

Technicals · 45/100

Volume 17.7M vs avg 21.7M

Method

Checks whether price movement is confirmed by trading activity.

Validation

H

History depth

Validation · 100/100

3072 closes analyzed

Method

More closes improve backtest coverage and reduce thin-history risk.

Valuation

P

PE and PEG

Valuation · 65/100

Forward PE 25.38x; PEG 1.41x; EV/Sales 10.28x

Method

Penalizes expensive multiples unless growth support is visible.

Composite formula

Composite = normalized weighted sum (14% quality trend, 12% technical tape, 12% momentum, 12% track record validation, 11% future value, 10% valuation, 10% analyst/revision, 7% risk brake, 6% news sentiment, 4% leadership, 2% social/developer traction), confidence-adjusted toward neutral by input coverage^0.7 x freshness factor x missing-critical-field penalty x analyst-disagreement penalty

Strategic inputs

0 roadmap items, 0 leadership roles, 0 social/developer channels, human-impact lens unavailable.

Factual coverage

87/100 from 107/114 sourced fields, 63% live source health, and 7 missing fields.

Accuracy trail

12.8% rolling hit rate across 1072 matured horizon scores. Accuracy is a rolling price-history proxy from available closes. Full field-by-field correctness requires storing daily factor snapshots and grading them after each horizon matures.

Guardrail

Buy/Hold/Sell labels are research stances. Predictive accuracy is shown beside the model and should be read with filings, risk tolerance, and current market conditions.

Bull case

+17.9%

$423.58

Momentum holds, quality signals stay firm, future-product execution improves, and valuation pressure does not widen.

Base case

+8.1%

$388.04

Weighted factor model using price, fundamentals, analyst, sentiment, roadmap, leadership, social traction, and risk inputs.

Stress case

-1.8%

$352.50

Volatility, missing-data, valuation, and balance-sheet brakes are applied to the setup.

Horizon model

Horizon matrix

Timeframe-specific weights: trading windows lean on tape; investor windows lean on quality, valuation, and revisions; strategic windows lean on future value.

Trading windows

1-30 day tape, momentum, and event risk.

1 Day

58/100 signal · 37/100 conf · 87/100 facts

Hold

+0.5%

$360.91

Drivers Risk brake 81/100 · Technical tape 54/100

7 Days

58/100 signal · 37/100 conf · 87/100 facts

Hold

+1.0%

$362.71

Drivers Risk brake 81/100 · Technical tape 54/100

15 Days

61/100 signal · 37/100 conf · 87/100 facts

Hold

+2.1%

$366.66

Drivers Track record validation 86/100 · Quality trend 74/100

30 Days

62/100 signal · 42/100 conf · 87/100 facts

Hold

+3.5%

$371.69

Drivers Risk brake 81/100 · Quality trend 74/100

Investor windows

Quarterly setup through one-year thesis checks.

3 Months

63/100 signal · 42/100 conf · 87/100 facts

Hold

+5.9%

$380.31

Drivers Quality trend 74/100 · Analyst/revision signal 64/100

6 Months

64/100 signal · 42/100 conf · 87/100 facts

Hold

+9.1%

$391.80

Drivers Quality trend 74/100 · Analyst/revision signal 64/100

1 Year

63/100 signal · 44/100 conf · 87/100 facts

Hold

+13.8%

$408.68

Drivers Quality trend 74/100 · Analyst/revision signal 64/100

Strategic windows

Multi-year durability, leadership, and future value.

3 Years

65/100 signal · 47/100 conf · 87/100 facts

Hold

+29.3%

$464.34

Drivers Quality trend 74/100 · Future value 65/100

5 Years

66/100 signal · 47/100 conf · 87/100 facts

Buy

+46.9%

$527.54

Drivers Quality trend 74/100 · Future value 65/100

10 Years

66/100 signal · 47/100 conf · 87/100 facts

Buy

+67.7%

$602.24

Drivers Quality trend 74/100 · Future value 65/100

Price-direction backtest

Daily scoring history

Tests whether the model's price-derived direction matched later closes — it does not yet validate the fundamental, analyst, or sentiment factors, which need persisted daily snapshots. Unmatured and multi-year lanes are still processing.

1 Day

23.9%

Price-tested

218 daily scores · 1.4% avg error

Latest: Hold +0.3% vs +0.4% actual

7 Days

17.0%

Price-tested

212 daily scores · 4.5% avg error

Latest: Hold +0.1% vs +0.8% actual

15 Days

10.3%

Price-tested

204 daily scores · 7.7% avg error

Latest: Hold +1.4% vs -6.5% actual

30 Days

4.8%

Price-tested

189 daily scores · 12.2% avg error

Latest: Hold +2.4% vs -6.2% actual

3 Months

12.2%

Price-tested

156 daily scores · 19.8% avg error

Latest: Hold +1.2% vs +18.9% actual

6 Months

0.0%

Price-tested

93 daily scores · 31.7% avg error

Latest: Hold +2.9% vs +11.7% actual

4 horizon lanes are hidden until enough future closes mature.

7 validation lanes need daily factor snapshots before TECHi shows historical accuracy for them.

Technical tape

Price-tested

20.5%

430 samples · latest 2026-06-11

Validated daily from historical price tape: SMA, RSI, MACD, volatility, drawdown, and short returns.

Momentum setup

Price-tested

10.9%

605 samples · latest 2026-06-03

Validated from rolling forward returns after trend and range-position signals.

Track record validation

Price-tested

8.1%

345 samples · latest 2026-04-30

Validated from recurring positive-return windows, long-run CAGR, and earnings-surprise evidence where available.

Risk brake

Price-tested

8.9%

549 samples · latest 2026-05-21

Validated as a price-history proxy: volatility, drawdown, and risk brakes are checked against later downside/upside behavior.

Frequently asked

Common questions.

What is TECHi Signal for GOOG?

TECHi Signal is the Formula scoring layer for Alphabet Inc Class C (GOOG). It blends technical tape, momentum, valuation, fundamentals, analyst revisions, sentiment, leadership, traction, and risk into an explainable research stance.

Is TECHi Signal a buy or sell recommendation?

No. Signal labels are research stances, not personalized financial advice. They show which inputs are constructive, balanced, watch-list, or risk-heavy so readers can decide what to research next.

How do technicals affect GOOG's Signal?

Technicals feed the Formula model through trend, momentum, RSI/MACD, moving averages, volume, volatility, and drawdown inputs. Short horizons weight technicals more heavily than long horizons.

How is Signal different from Forecast for GOOG?

Forecast focuses on analyst targets, ratings, estimates, and scenario math. Signal is TECHi's broader cross-signal model that combines Forecast data with technicals, valuation, fundamentals, catalysts, sentiment, and risk.