Skip to main content
Methodology published · Market data, model notes, and corrections process are public · Data policy · Corrections policy
CORZ logo

NasdaqGS · Technology · TECHi Signal

Core Scientific, Inc. (CORZ) Stock Rating & Risk Score

TECHi Signal compresses current quote, fundamental, technical, analyst, and strategic inputs into one explainable research stance for CORZ.

Start here

CORZ: Balanced watch

Balanced watch. Track record validation (74/100) is the strongest signal; technical tape (34/100) is the main constraint. Model confidence is 30/100 — some inputs are unavailable, so treat this as a directional research screen rather than a forecast. Long-term secular context is tracked separately: 1 Year +29.7% total; yesterday -6.4%. Comparable past signals have verified against subsequent prices 9% of the time. It ranks #98/120 across the TECHi coverage universe and #63/77 in Technology. Use the top read for speed, then inspect the Formula lab when you need the full evidence trail.

Signal

49/100

Low confidence

Inputs

62/76

71/100 factual coverage

Universe

#98/120

19/100 peer percentile

Nearest

Hold

1 Day -1.0%

Formula signalLow confidence62/76 inputsLast updated Aug 18, 4:00 PM EDT

Balanced watch

Dashboard view for the current Signal score, confidence, input coverage, and active horizon. The full narrative read lives in Start Here; the evidence trail is consolidated below.

Technical tape

34/100

12% wt

16/16 inputs

Forecast layer

60/100

10% wt

3/5 inputs

Valuation

37/100

10% wt

4/8 inputs

Risk brake

35/100

7% wt

7/8 inputs

49

Signal score

Active horizon

1 day to 10 years + strategic setup

71/100 factual coverage, 35% live source health.

TECHi coverage universe

CORZ against fresh TECHi coverage.

Peer ranks are recalculated from the latest live quotes, so the context moves when the underlying data moves.

Universe rank

#98/120

19/100 percentile among scored peers.

Sector rank

#63/77

Technology coverage cohort.

Fresh symbols

120

120 tickers scored in the trailing week.

Freshest pull

Aug 19, 2026

CORZ model as of Aug 18, 2026.

Horizon read

The stance changes by timeframe.

These are Formula stances by timeframe, not execution instructions. The full validation grid is below.

1 Day

18/100 conf

Hold

-1.0%

Technical tape 34/100 / Momentum setup 36/100

7 Days

18/100 conf

Hold

-1.6%

Technical tape 34/100 / Momentum setup 36/100

15 Days

18/100 conf

Hold

-1.6%

Technical tape 34/100 / Momentum setup 36/100

30 Days

20/100 conf

Hold

-2.3%

Technical tape 34/100 / Momentum setup 36/100

3 Months

20/100 conf

Hold

-3.6%

Quality trend 37/100 / Technical tape 34/100

6 Months

20/100 conf

Hold

-5.1%

Quality trend 37/100 / Valuation pressure 37/100

1 Year

22/100 conf

Hold

-6.9%

Quality trend 37/100 / Valuation pressure 37/100

3 Years

24/100 conf

Hold

-10.2%

Quality trend 37/100 / Valuation pressure 37/100

5 Years

24/100 conf

Hold

-19.1%

Quality trend 37/100 / Valuation pressure 37/100

10 Years

24/100 conf

Hold

-27.5%

Quality trend 37/100 / Valuation pressure 37/100

What moves it

Strongest inputs

Track record validation

74/100

7/8 inputs · 12% dashboard weight

Analyst/revision signal

60/100

3/5 inputs · 10% dashboard weight

News sentiment

58/100

1/3 inputs · 6% dashboard weight

Pressure points

Technical tape

34/100

16/16 inputs · 12% dashboard weight

Risk brake

35/100

7/8 inputs · 7% dashboard weight

Momentum setup

36/100

10/10 inputs · 12% dashboard weight

Habit loop

Watch the next price trigger, not just the score.

CORZ's nearest horizon is hold at -1.0%; use a dashboard price alert to catch the next break before the next Signal refresh.

Set price alert

Formula lab

Factor evidence, scenarios, horizons, and validation.

CompositeHorizonsValidation

Evidence lab

Balanced watch

Dashboard score

49

/100

1 day to 10 years + strategic setup

Low confidence

62 of 76 fields are powering the model.

History progress

Past returns in Signal

Scored windows

1 Year

87/100

+29.7%

+29.8% CAGR

$14.53 to $18.85

2025-08-18 to 2026-08-18

1-year progress blends current return with annualized context for cleaner long-cycle comparison.

Last month

12/100

-15.8%

CAGR unavailable

$22.40 to $18.85

2026-07-20 to 2026-08-18

1-month progress reflects recent tape with less sensitivity than daily windows.

Last week

33/100

-4.6%

CAGR unavailable

$19.76 to $18.85

2026-08-11 to 2026-08-18

1-week progress tracks short-cycle tape and can rotate meaningfully with each close cluster.

Yesterday

11/100

-6.4%

CAGR unavailable

$20.13 to $18.85

2026-08-17 to 2026-08-18

1-day progress tracks latest close-to-close momentum from tape.

3 empty progress windows are hidden until enough closes exist.

A-Z factor map

Available scoring inputs

24/26 factors

2 unscored inputs are hidden until the quote stack has verified fields for them.

Balance sheet

C

Cash runway

Balance sheet · 26/100

Current 0.89x; cash/debt 0.29x

Method

Checks liquidity, leverage, and balance-sheet room.

Data coverage

Z

Zero-missing risk

Data coverage · 33/100

23 missing fields

Method

Shows how much the model is relying on available fields versus placeholders.

External view

A

Analyst conviction

External view · 60/100

Consensus 4.15; upside +97%; disagreement +143.2%

Method

Uses consensus, target spread, target disagreement, revisions, and latest EPS surprise.

I

Implied upside

External view · 100/100

Target move +97%; disagreement +143.2%

Method

Measures analyst target room versus the latest quote and flags wide high-low target dispersion.

Forecast

U

Upside scenarios

Forecast · 49/100

Future 50/100; analyst 60/100

Method

Combines TECHi future-value signal with outside target support.

Growth

G

Growth pulse

Growth · 50/100

Revenue +108.8%; EPS -8200%

Method

Compares latest YoY sales and earnings momentum.

Y

Year-over-year proof

Growth · 56/100

1M windows 56/100; 3M windows 67/100

Method

Looks for repeated conversion from past setups into later closes.

Momentum

J

Jump signal

Momentum · 38/100

5D return -4.6%

Method

Captures the newest short-term price impulse.

W

52-week position

Momentum · 61/100

Range position +33%

Method

Scores trend strength while trimming crowded highs.

Quality

F

Free cash flow

Quality · 33/100

FCF margin -132.6%; yield -9.6%

Method

Connects profit quality to cash generation and market value.

K

Key margins

Quality · 10/100

Gross +28.3%; operating -127.4%

Method

Rewards margin breadth before assigning quality confidence.

O

Operating leverage

Quality · 0/100

Operating margin -127.4%

Method

Shows whether revenue is converting into operating profit.

Q

Quality trend

Quality · 37/100

Quality composite 37/100

Method

Combines margins, returns, growth, and cash conversion.

Risk

B

Beta risk

Risk · 8/100

Beta 5.592

Method

Lower and steadier beta earns a stronger risk-adjusted score.

Sentiment

N

News tone

Sentiment · 58/100

7 headlines; unavailable

Method

Headline breadth and sentiment are capped so news does not overpower data.

Strategic

L

Leadership depth

Strategic · 50/100

0 named executives

Method

Adds C-suite coverage for execution visibility.

S

Social/developer

Strategic · 50/100

Social composite 50/100

Method

Uses verified public channels and developer gravity when available.

Technical risk

D

Drawdown control

Technical risk · 12/100

90D max drawdown -37.9%

Method

Scores whether recent losses stayed controlled versus the latest peak.

Technicals

M

MACD pressure

Technicals · 34/100

MACD hist -0.06; slope -0.06

Method

Reads MACD line pressure against its signal line plus histogram direction.

R

RSI balance

Technicals · 42/100

RSI 14 39.7; Stoch %K 6.6

Method

Rewards constructive oscillator momentum without extreme overbought stretch.

T

Technical tape

Technicals · 34/100

20D -21.5%; ATR 8.9%; %B 0.14

Method

Blends returns, SMA/EMA crosses (above), RSI, MACD, Stochastic, Bollinger Bands, ATR, volume, volatility, and drawdown.

V

Volume confirmation

Technicals · 55/100

Volume 13.8M vs avg 12.6M

Method

Checks whether price movement is confirmed by trading activity.

Validation

H

History depth

Validation · 100/100

644 closes analyzed

Method

More closes improve backtest coverage and reduce thin-history risk.

Valuation

P

PE and PEG

Valuation · 21/100

Forward PE unavailable; PEG unavailable; EV/Sales 19.5x

Method

Penalizes expensive multiples unless growth support is visible.

Composite formula

Composite = normalized weighted sum (14% quality trend, 12% technical tape, 12% momentum, 12% track record validation, 11% future value, 10% valuation, 10% analyst/revision, 7% risk brake, 6% news sentiment, 4% leadership, 2% social/developer traction), confidence-adjusted toward neutral by input coverage^0.7 x freshness factor x missing-critical-field penalty x analyst-disagreement penalty

Strategic inputs

0 roadmap items, 0 leadership roles, 0 social/developer channels, human-impact lens unavailable.

Factual coverage

71/100 from 73/96 sourced fields, 35% live source health, and 23 missing fields.

Accuracy trail

9% rolling hit rate across 1072 scored signals. Hit rate is measured against subsequent price history for each horizon. Treat it as a proxy, not audited performance.

Guardrail

Buy/Hold/Sell labels are research stances. Predictive accuracy is shown beside the model and should be read with filings, risk tolerance, and current market conditions.

Bull case

+17.4%

$22.14

Momentum holds, quality signals stay firm, future-product execution improves, and valuation pressure does not widen.

Base case

-4.6%

$17.99

Weighted factor model using price, fundamentals, analyst, sentiment, roadmap, leadership, social traction, and risk inputs.

Stress case

-29.0%

$13.39

Volatility, missing-data, valuation, and balance-sheet brakes are applied to the setup.

Horizon model

Horizon matrix

Timeframe-specific weights: trading windows lean on tape; investor windows lean on quality, valuation, and revisions; strategic windows lean on future value.

Trading windows

1-30 day tape, momentum, and event risk.

1 Day

38/100 signal · 18/100 conf · 71/100 facts

Hold

-1.0%

$18.66

Drivers Technical tape 34/100 · Momentum setup 36/100

7 Days

41/100 signal · 18/100 conf · 71/100 facts

Hold

-1.6%

$18.55

Drivers Technical tape 34/100 · Momentum setup 36/100

15 Days

44/100 signal · 18/100 conf · 71/100 facts

Hold

-1.6%

$18.55

Drivers Technical tape 34/100 · Momentum setup 36/100

30 Days

44/100 signal · 20/100 conf · 71/100 facts

Hold

-2.3%

$18.42

Drivers Technical tape 34/100 · Momentum setup 36/100

Investor windows

Quarterly setup through one-year thesis checks.

3 Months

44/100 signal · 20/100 conf · 71/100 facts

Hold

-3.6%

$18.17

Drivers Quality trend 37/100 · Technical tape 34/100

6 Months

44/100 signal · 20/100 conf · 71/100 facts

Hold

-5.1%

$17.89

Drivers Quality trend 37/100 · Valuation pressure 37/100

1 Year

45/100 signal · 22/100 conf · 71/100 facts

Hold

-6.9%

$17.55

Drivers Quality trend 37/100 · Valuation pressure 37/100

Strategic windows

Multi-year durability, leadership, and future value.

3 Years

46/100 signal · 24/100 conf · 71/100 facts

Hold

-10.2%

$16.93

Drivers Quality trend 37/100 · Valuation pressure 37/100

5 Years

45/100 signal · 24/100 conf · 71/100 facts

Hold

-19.1%

$15.25

Drivers Quality trend 37/100 · Valuation pressure 37/100

10 Years

45/100 signal · 24/100 conf · 71/100 facts

Hold

-27.5%

$13.67

Drivers Quality trend 37/100 · Valuation pressure 37/100

Price-direction backtest

Daily scoring history

Tests whether the model's price-derived direction matched later closes — it does not yet validate the fundamental, analyst, or sentiment factors, which need persisted daily history. Longer and multi-year horizons score once enough closes have matured.

1 Day

12.4%

Price-tested

218 daily scores · 3.6% avg error

Latest: Hold -0.4% vs -6.4% actual

7 Days

4.2%

Price-tested

212 daily scores · 9.1% avg error

Latest: Hold -0.6% vs -10.3% actual

15 Days

7.4%

Price-tested

204 daily scores · 13.1% avg error

Latest: Hold -0.9% vs -9.1% actual

30 Days

6.9%

Price-tested

189 daily scores · 19.6% avg error

Latest: Hold -0.9% vs -12.5% actual

3 Months

11.5%

Price-tested

156 daily scores · 23.6% avg error

Latest: Hold +1.7% vs -20.0% actual

6 Months

16.1%

Price-tested

93 daily scores · 34.8% avg error

Latest: Hold 0.0% vs +9.4% actual

4 horizon lanes are hidden until enough future closes mature.

7 validations appear once TECHi has tracked enough daily factor history for them.

Technical tape

Price-tested

8.4%

430 samples · latest 2026-08-17

Validated daily from historical price tape: SMA, RSI, MACD, volatility, drawdown, and short returns.

Momentum setup

Price-tested

6.1%

605 samples · latest 2026-08-07

Validated from rolling forward returns after trend and range-position signals.

Track record validation

Price-tested

9.0%

345 samples · latest 2026-07-07

Validated from recurring positive-return windows, long-run CAGR, and earnings-surprise evidence where available.

Risk brake

Price-tested

8.4%

549 samples · latest 2026-07-28

Validated as a price-history proxy: volatility, drawdown, and risk brakes are checked against later downside/upside behavior.

Frequently asked

Common questions.

What is TECHi Signal for CORZ?

TECHi Signal combines available technical, valuation, fundamental, analyst, sentiment, catalyst, and risk inputs for Core Scientific, Inc. (CORZ) into an explainable research stance.

Is TECHi Signal investment advice?

No. Signal labels are research context, not personalized investment advice or an order recommendation.

How is Signal different from Forecast for CORZ?

Forecast focuses on analyst targets and scenarios. Signal combines that evidence with technical, fundamental, sentiment, catalyst, and risk inputs.